Psychoanalysis as a profession is regulated at the international and regional levels. As a treatment and theory of mind it's taught and practiced all over the world.
Psychoanalysis by the numbers
117
IPA member societies
38
APsA approved traning institutes
9
Active, peer-reviwed journals
More Resources
Professional Associations
International Psychoanalytical Association
American Psychoanalytic Association
What is Psychoanalysis?
Introduction with video from the IPA
Definition from the American Psychological Association
Evidence Base
My own Definitions
First description
Psychoanalytic treatment is the slow work of watching how the mind transforms information from both inside and outside, creating particular experiences of self and other in the process. There are no ready made answers or directions about how to live or act. There is only the psychoanalytic method which we do our best to follow during each session and that, when practiced consistently over time, allows for something real and effective and meaningful to happen. It's a bit hard to describe this from the outside, but it's not magical nor mystical nor necessarily mysterious.
It's something like: What happens in your life begins to happen in the treatment. Your mind works the same whether you're in a therapy session or not. That's the point. Yes, in a way, you're interested in learning how to be different somehow. The trouble with that is, "but how?" The paradox of this way of working is that different comes from getting more clear on what already is. If you think about it, how could it be otherwise? I can't tell you how to be. Anything I could say to you would land only intellectually and would be nothing more than you could read on the internet or in a book. No, the work is in diving into each individual moment and getting hold of how your mind moves and shapes experience 'behind the scenes' so to speak. The treatment just acts as a magnifying glass; it concentrates the otherwise diffuse patterns of your life, the ones you live through but only tend to recognize in retrospect, or the things you know about yourself but try not to for various reasons.
In other words, the analyst does not preach, condone, teach, encourage, coach, judge, criticize, or persuade. We do our best simply to describe particular sorts of processes occurring during the session. These processes are ways that information from the session is given specific interpretations and leads to particular sorts of mind states and experiences. This means that what the analyst says is empirically verifiable to the patient themselves. Not only should it sound true, but once seen the truth itself should be self-evident. When these truths are struggled with as such, the mind is freed of the work of avoidance and so begins to function better. The resulting clarity gives the therapeutic process meaning, structure, and directionality, and helps the patient to tolerate the pain and difficulty that are also part of it.
In still other words, you're asked in each session to speak as freely as possible about whatever feels important to you. The direction is to do the best you can to allow your mind to work and to say your thoughts outloud as they occur. The experience at first is awkward and difficult, but soon one begins to understand that to speak freely in this way (and free is always relative and meaningfully constrained) is to say things that feel true and alive and meaningful to us and we register that as vulnerable somehow. To share thoughts in this way is to put the analyst in a position to see something real about us, and this risks painful feelings. Conviction about and trust in the process is generated from an experience of the analyst as relatively neutral, which makes it obvious that the painful feeling is not being inflicted from without but freed from within, and recognizing this initiates growth promoting processes related to mourning, repairing, and forgiving.
Second description
Each of us lives within a model of the world that the mind creates for us moment by moment. We look out from within it onto a 'world' it is representing. Our perceptions and experiences are structured by this model, and the limit of our ability to sustainably change ourselves is set by it. In other words, while we do perceive and interact with a world that does indeed exist outside of ourselves, we never have direct access to it. We reach it only through the representation we make of it, that our minds make of it for 'us'. But in bridging the gap between outside and an inside it is also charged with organizing, the mind leaves an uneven seam. Bits that really belong to 'us' get mixed into the representation we make of the outside world. These facts are both widely accepted and ubiquitously under appreciated.
Psychoanalysis, as a theory and a practice, is built on this understanding of things. It itself is a model which aims to make the mind’s component processes observable as such and in real time. These processes amount to the activity of meaning making. They are what the mind does when it organizes raw stimuli, i.e., when it constructs its representations. They are bits of "us", and "we" exist always in relationship with the surrounding world. The bits gotten hold of in analytic sessions are those uneven points in the seam (the points where our model of the world has, without our realizing it, ceased to faithfully reflect the world itself). Identifying this allows for a mechanism of action (a way of helping) based on something other than education (as in cognitive therapy), "exposure" (as in behavioral therapy), or reconstruction (i.e., as in "dynamic" therapy). To get hold of these processes is to be able to see how one's models of self, other, and world have come to distort more than reveal the realities they intend to represent. As a result, one comes to understand how, in an important sense, they have been creating their own version of the world as opposed to struggling with the one given to them.
Importantly, the power of psychoanalysis does not hinge on the external definition of Truth. The analyst does not act as an arbiter of Truth, but as an observer in the position to watch the mind construct it's version of reality from a perspective inaccessible to the patient themself (we are all bounded in this way). In a way that's difficult to describe but straightforward to show, what gets talked about in psychoanalytic sessions is how this process of construction happens and why. Speaking to these processes as they occur has a powerfully sobering effect. These are moments when we know ourselves more completely and therefore see the world around us more clearly. It's the state of mind restored in these moments that implies the abatement of symptoms and increased ability to productively engage the world and people around us. These are moments when one learns that how the world looks and feels to us has a lot to do with how the line between self and other gets drawn, and when the opportunity to understand why the line gets drawn like that in the first place opens up. Helping the mind to draw the line between self and other more accurately greatly improves its efficiency. Our ability to think gets a lot better. Importantly, this does not eliminate suffering but makes it more meaningful and hence productive.
Other Ways to Learn...
Clinical Supervision
Clinical supervision is essential for continued growth in this field. Without it, we get stuck in automatic ways of thinking and this drains some of the meaningfulness out of the work.
I tend to work best with clinicians who have an interest and openness to learning. Fee structures are set on a case by case basis, but my emphasis is always on accessibilty. My overall intention is to build community and demystify psychoanalytic work.
Case Consultations
Case consultations are different from supervision in that they're time limited and the clinician is typically interested in getting feedback on a specific clinical impasse.
Upcoming Seminar
I will soon be launching a seminar designed to give practicing clinicians with an interest in psychoanalysis some exposure to psychoanalytic thinking. I'll assign a well known paper from a peer reviewed journal that provides an opportunity to grapple with core psychoanalytic concepts. Participants will read through the article ahead of our first appointment along with some written guidance of what to pay attention to. Then in our first session, after introductions, I'll facilitate a group discussion designed to elicit what participants understood or misunderstood or didn't quite understand. Then armed with this information I'll make recommendations about how to proceed ahead of our next session. We'll meet five times total either weekly or every other week. The seminar itself will be focused on clarifying the concept of transference and defining 'a transference interpretation', and this in and of itself will entail elucidating the psychoanalytic view of personhood. The primary goal of the seminar will be to give participants a clearer sense for what's unique in psychoanalytic practice, and to help alert them of the often large distance between how psychoanalytic terms are used colloquially versus how they are defined technically. Dates TBA.